Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 14 (0.24 seconds)

B Purushothama Nayudu vs Union Of India on 18 July, 2019

11. Moreover, the reference given by the applicant in cases of B.S. Purushotham vs UOI & Ors in OA No.1439/2012 dated 01.12.2017 of CAT Hyberabad Bench Bench, Mahendra Singh vs UOI & Ors in WP(C) No.5065/2002 dated 31.07.2024 of High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, are not squarely applicable in the present case as it was not the negligence or error in decision making rather it was the misconduct to misuse the provision of obtaining confirm tickets under TATKAL Quota for his own pecuniary benefits.
Telangana High Court Cites 34 - Cited by 0 - A R Reddy - Full Document

Union Of India vs H. C. Goel on 30 August, 1963

In Union of India v. H.C. Goel [Union of India v. H.C. Goel Goel, (1964) 4 SCR 718 : AIR 1964 SC 364] this Court held at SCR p. 728 (AIR p. 369, para 20) that if the conclusion, upon consideration of the evidence reached by the disciplinary authority, is perverse or suffers from patent nt error on the face of the record or based on no evidence at all, a writ of certiorari could be issued."
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 905 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1   2 Next