Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 29 (0.28 seconds)Section 23 in The Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 151 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 47 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Lakshmi Ram Bhuyan vs Hari Prasad Bhuyan & Ors on 20 November, 2002
In that case petition was filed for enhancement of rate
of interest by the contractor invoking Sections 152 C.P.C.
That petition was dismissed and Supreme Court upheld the same;
In LAKSHMI RAM BHUYAN vs. HARI PRASAD BHUYAN7, Supreme
Court held only intention expressed in the judgment must formulate
into relief.
Shyam Sunder Agarwal & Co vs Union Of India on 9 January, 1996
23. In this case, reference Court specifically refused interest on
solatium and additional market value and the same is confirmed by
this Court in the appeal, therefore, it cannot be treated as an
accidental slip or omission. With regard to benefit extended by the
Honble Supreme Court in GURPREET SINGH vs. UNION OF INDIA9
and SUNDER vs. UNION OF INDIA8, as rightly pointed out by learned
Government Pleader the remedy of applicant is not under Section 152
CPC and his remedy is otherwise.
Gurpreet Singh vs Union Of India on 19 October, 2006
23. In this case, reference Court specifically refused interest on
solatium and additional market value and the same is confirmed by
this Court in the appeal, therefore, it cannot be treated as an
accidental slip or omission. With regard to benefit extended by the
Honble Supreme Court in GURPREET SINGH vs. UNION OF INDIA9
and SUNDER vs. UNION OF INDIA8, as rightly pointed out by learned
Government Pleader the remedy of applicant is not under Section 152
CPC and his remedy is otherwise.
Bai Shakriben (Dead) Natwar Melsingh & ... vs Special Land Acquisition Officer & Anr on 6 May, 1996
In BAI SHAKRIBEN (DEAD) BY NATWAR MELSINGH vs.
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER10, Honble Supreme Court
clearly indicated that omission to award additional amount under
Section 23 (1-A) enhanced interest under Section 28 and solatium
under Section 23 (2) are not clerical or arithmetical mistakes and the
Court has no power or jurisdiction to award those amounts under
Section 152 of CPC.
State Of Punjab vs Darshan Singh on 29 October, 2003
In STATE OF PUNJAB vs. DARSHAN SINGH13, Honble
Supreme Court noticed that the courts below have been liberally
construing and applying the provisions under Sections 151 & 152
CPC even after passing effective orders in the lis pending before them
and cautioned that the Court cannot modify, alter or add any terms to
its original judgment, decree or order by exercising powers under
Sections 151 & 152 CPC.