Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)Union Of India vs M/S. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd. Tthrough ... on 23 August, 2022
In such circumstances, pendency of the review of the decision in
Union of India vs. Ganapati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd, cannot be a ground to
interfere with the order passed by the Tribunal. It is also well settled that
mere pendency of the Review Petition will not be a ground to assail the
orders impugned in the appeals.
Section 5 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
THE DENTISTS (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2016
National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017
In any case, when faced with
conflicting judgments by Bench of equal stength of this Court, it is the
earlier one which is to be followed by the High Courts, as held by a 5 Judge
Bench in National Insurance Company Limied v. Pranay Sethi (2017) 16
SCC 680. The High Courts, of course, will do so with careful regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case before it."
M/S. Nutrient Marine Foods Ltd vs The Adjudicating Authority on 13 September, 2022
8.Recently, the issue involved herein came up for consideration before
the Telengana High Court in Nutrient Marine Foods Ltd. vs. Adjudicating
Authority, Chennai [(2023) 152 taxmann.com 86 (Telengana)] and it was
observed as follows:
Union Territory Of Ladakh & Ors vs Jammu & Kashmir National Conference And ... on 14 August, 2023
In this context, it is useful to refer to the
decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in Union Territory of Ladakh
and others vs. Jammu and Kashmir National Conference and another
(Civil Appeal No. 5707 of 2023 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 18727 of
2023 dated 06.09.2023) wherein, it was held as follows:
Section 49 in The Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs M/S Nutrient Marine Foods Ltd. on 15 May, 2023
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
C.M.A.Nos.2604, 2605 and 2606 of 2023
8.1. As against the decision of the Telengana High Court,
mentioned above, an appeal was filed by the department and the Honourable
Supreme Court in Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Nutrient
Marine Foods Limited [(2023) 152 taxmann.com 87 (SC)] has dismissed
the same, in the following terms:
1