Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.25 seconds)
State vs Udit Narayan (On Bail) on 28 June, 2022 cites

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Satya Narayan Pandit on 15 March, 2010

FIR No. 280/2015 State vs. Udit Narayan Page No. 9 of 16 Police had seized by helmet vide seizure memo Ex.PW1/B which bears my signature at point A. My blood stained jeans pant was also seized by police. The statement of accused was recorded which was Ex.PW1/C bears my signature at point A. The proceedings in respect of JCL boys were also conducted in my presence. Two dandas were also recovered at the instance of JCL and same were seized by police vide seizure memo Ex.PW1/D and Ex.PW1/E, both bearing my signature at point A. I can identify the case property.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 3 - Cited by 2 - D Misra - Full Document

Ganesan vs Station House Officer on 21 November, 2015

23. As regards contention that offence under Section 395 IPC is not made out, as the number of persons was mentioned as '3-4' in statement Ex.PW1/A and examination-in- chief of the complainant and as '4' in MLC Ex.PW5/A, it can be stated that when the statement of the complainant was recorded, he was receiving treatment in Aruna Asaf Ali Hospital. The complainant categorically stated that number of robbers were five. Moreover, the accused alongwith his four associates was apprehended on 27.04.2015 at 09.00 a.m. in L-Park, Sector-4, Timarpur vide apprehension memo Ex.PW8/B on identification of the complainant. The prosecution charge- sheeted five accused persons including the accused before this Court. Other four associates of the accused were forwarded to Juvenile Justice Board. (See: Ganesan vs. State Rep. by Station House Officer, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1023).
Kerala High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - B P Kumar - Full Document

Jai Karan vs State Of (N.C.T. Delhi) on 27 September, 1999

Vide separate judgement announced in the open Court, the accused, namely, Udit Narayan is convicted for committing offence under Section 395 IPC. A copy of judgment is given to Ld. Legal Aid Counsel for the convict vide acknowledgement on the margin of the order­sheet. As directed by Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case of Karan vs. State of NCT of Delhi, Crl. Appeal No. 352/2020 decided on 27.11.2020, the convict is directed to state his paying capacity in the format prescribed as 'Annexure A' within 10 days. The State shall state expenses incurred by the prosecution on affidavit. To come up for arguments on the point of sentence on 28.07.2022. Issue notice to SHO, Timarpur to submit antecedents / involvements of the convict. Issue notice to concerned Jail Superintendent to submit conduct report and nominal roll of the convict.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 182 - Full Document
1   2 Next