Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.22 seconds)
Yatendra Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 5 Others on 2 February, 2021 cites

State Of U.P. And 2 Others vs Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan on 8 May, 2015

Facts in the case of Vaibhav Singh (supra) and Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan (supra) are clearly distinct from the facts of the present case. In the case of Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan, the State Government had issued a Government Order, dated 23rd September, 2011, as per which, the eligibility had to be examined on the date of first application moved for grant of compassionate appointment. On the date of first application, Raj Surya Pratap Singh Chauhan was eligible for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector (Ministerial), but he failed to qualify in the recruitment held for the post. His claim for appointment to the post of Constable was accepted, but he refused to join. His subsequent application for appointment to the post of Sub-Inspector (Civil Police) was declined on the ground that he did not possess requisite qualification on the date of his first application and had also failed to avail of the compassionate appointment offered for the post of Constable.
Allahabad High Court Cites 28 - Cited by 8 - R Kumar - Full Document

Vaibhav Singh vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 14 January, 2020

Learned counsel for the petitioner assailing the order dated 6.11.2009, submits that as per averments made in the impugned order itself the period of five years expired on 5.5.2006 and before the said date he had already moved an application for compassionate appointment. He further submits that his claim was rejected on 6th November, 2009 and on the date of consideration of his claim he had minimum required age of appointment i.e.21 years on 4.5.2007. In view thereof order impugned cannot be sustained as the application was moved within a period of five years from the date of death of his father. As soon as he attained the majority and on the date of consideration of his claim he fulfilled requirement for appointment. He further placed reliance on the judgment of this court in Vaibhav Singh vs. State of U.P. and others dated 23.12.2005 in writ petition no. 52 of 2003. Learned counsel for the petitioner inviting the attention of the court to the last paragraph of the judgment and submits that his case is squarely covered.
Allahabad High Court Cites 7 - Cited by 1 - M C Tripathi - Full Document
1