Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.17 seconds)Section 3 in The U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916 [Entire Act]
Abhinesh Mahore vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 October, 2014
In respect to the second submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgement of the Madhya Pradesh High Court rendered in the case of Abhinesh Mahore and others Vs. State of MP and others, dated 14.10.2014, reported in 2014 Law Suit (MP)1552:2015 AIR (MP) 7 and has submitted that it is only the Governor, who is competent to decide the objection.
Shamsher Singh & Anr vs State Of Punjab on 23 August, 1974
14. The Constitution of India provides parliamentary system of the Government both at the Union and the State levels subject to the discretionary functions or powers of the President and Governor. The Governor is not to exercise any function personally (Shamsher Singh Vs. State of Punjab) AIR 1974 SC 2192 (paras 55, 138). The Governor is a constitutional head of the executive and his powers are to be exercised on the advice of the Council of Ministers and through Ministers and other officers to whom functions may be allocated according to Rules of Business made under Article 166(3) of the Constitution of India. Any function vested in the Governor, whether executive, legislative or quasi judicial in nature and whether vested by the Constitution or by a Statute, may thus be delegated according to Rules of Business, unless the contrary is clearly provided for by constitutional or statutory provisions. When a function is so allocated by Rules of Business, the decision of the Minister or other officer empowered by those rules becomes the decision of the Governor.
Article 243P in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1