Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.31 seconds)Ministry Of Finance & Anr vs S.B. Ramesh on 2 February, 1998
(d) Inquiry conducted ex parte without notice at various
stages as required; When a proceeding is conducted Ex Parte,
the delinquent is entitled to participate at any stage of the
inquiry. Thus, at each stage, despite the ex parte inquiry,
notice shall be addressed to the delinquent giving him an
opportunity to participate in the proceedings. In fact, provision
under Rule 9.12 also falls under this category. The counsel for
the applicant relied upon the decision by the Apex Court in the
case of S.B. Ramesh Ministry of Finance v. S.B. Ramesh,
(1998) 3 SCC 227, upheld the reasoning given by the Tribunal
in allowing the OA filed by S.B. Ramesh with reference to the
entitlement of the delinquent to notice at various stage even if
set ex parte. The Tribunal has in that case observed as under:
Managing Director Ecil Hyderabad Etc. ... vs B. Karunakar Etc. Etc on 1 October, 1993
(e) Non supply of inquiry report and no opportunity given
to represent against the inquiry report: It is settled law from the
date of judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MD, ECIL vs
13
O.A 4110/2013
B. Karunakar relied upon by the counsel for the applicant that
it is mandatory to supply a copy of inquiry report to the charged
officer and give him opportunity to make a representation
against the same.
Krushnakant B. Parmar vs Union Of India & Anr on 15 February, 2012
In the case of
Krushnakant B. Parmar v. Union of India, (2012) 3 SCC
178, the Apex Court has held as under:-
Central Industrial Security Force And ... vs Abrar Ali on 14 December, 2016
In the case of Central
Industrial Security Force vs Abrar Ali (2017)4 SCC 507, the
Apex Court in para 18 thereof has held as under:-
Union Of India & Ors vs Bishamber Das Dogra on 26 May, 2009
In any event, past conduct of a delinquent employee can be
taken into consideration while imposing penalty. We are
supported in this view by a judgment of this Court in Union of
India v. Bishamber Das Dogra, held as follows:
Article 311 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 20 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Coinage Act, 2011 [Entire Act]
South Bengal State Transport Corp vs Ashok Kumar Ghosh & Ors on 6 May, 2010
In
South Bengal State Transport Corpn. v. Ashok Kumar
Ghosh, (2010) 11 SCC 71 : (2011) 1 SCC (L&S) 58, the
purpose of supply of statement of imputation of misconduct
has been spelt out by the Apex Court and the same is as under:-