Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 27 (0.22 seconds)Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 57 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Punjab vs Balbir Singh on 1 March, 1994
31. I find that in Sajan Abraham (supra), placing reliance on State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1994)3 SCC 299, it has been held that Section 57 is not mandatory in nature and when substantial compliance is made, it would not vitiate the prosecution case.
Section 18 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 41 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Karnail Singh vs State Of Haryana on 29 July, 2009
In Mohan Lal v State of Rajasthan, 2015 CRLJ 2811 (SC), the court referred to the decision in Karnail Singh v. State of Haryana (2009) 8 SCC 539, wherein the issue emerged for consideration is whether Section 42 of the NDPS Act is mandatory and failure to take down the information in writing and forthwith sending a report to his immediate officer superior would cause prejudice to the accused.
Sajan Abraham vs State Of Kerala on 7 August, 2001
31. I find that in Sajan Abraham (supra), placing reliance on State of Punjab v. Balbir Singh (1994)3 SCC 299, it has been held that Section 57 is not mandatory in nature and when substantial compliance is made, it would not vitiate the prosecution case.