Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.40 seconds)The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
Section 177 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Harpreet Kaur And Others vs Mohinder Yadav And Others on 18 March, 2019
In the judgement passed in the case reported in
2022 SCC OnLine SC 1723 (Harpreet Kaur and Others Vs.
Mohinder Yadav and others) it has been held that each child and
mother is entitled to Rs.40,000/- under the head 'loss of consortium'.
Rahul Ganpatrao Sable vs Laxman Maruti Jadhav (Dead) Through Its ... on 5 July, 2023
In the judgement passed in the case reported in 2023 SCC Online SC
780 (Rahul Ganpatrao Sable Vs. Laxman Maruti Jadhav (Dead)
through Lrs. And others) paragraph 33, it has been held that "loss of
consortium" has to be awarded to each dependant separately.
The New India Assurance Company Limited vs Somwati on 7 September, 2020
This Court finds that such view was in consonance with the judgment
passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "New India
Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Somwati" (Supra). In the present case, no
amount has been awarded on account of "loss of love and affection"
Narinder Singh vs New India Assurance Company Ltd And Ors on 4 September, 2014
In the judgment passed in the case of "Narinder Singh Vs. New
India Assurance Company Ltd." reported in (2014) 9 SCC 324, it has
been held that a bare perusal of section 39 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988
shows that no person shall drive the motor vehicle in any public place
without any valid registration granted by the registering authority in
accordance with the provisions of the Act. In the said case, the
accident had taken place after expiry of the one-month period of
11
validity of temporary registration and nothing was brough on record
that the owner had applied for permanent registration as contemplated
under section 39 of the Act of 1988 or made an application for
extension of the period of temporary registration on ground of some
special reasons. It was held that using a vehicle on the public road
without registration is not only an offence punishable under section
192 of the Act of 1988 but also a fundamental breach of the terms and
conditions of policy contract.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Ayush Tiwari 29 Mac/861/2019 Smt. ... on 11 July, 2020
c) On the point of interest, judgment reported in 2022 SCC
OnLine Jhar 1392 (Branch Manager of Bajaj Allianz
General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mansura Bibi and others).
Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Bhagat Singh Rawat on 27 March, 2023
The judgment passed in the case of Bhagat
Singh Rawat (Supra) was essentially dealing with award of
compensation under the heading "loss of love and affection" over and
above "loss of consortium" which was found to be impermissible.
Royal Sundaram Alliance Insurance Co. ... vs Latha on 23 November, 2020
In the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Madras High Court
reported in 2012 Supreme (Mad) 3656 (Royal Sundaram Alliance
Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Latha & Others), the vehicle was being driven
without displaying the certificate. In the said judgment, it was
observed that having shown that the vehicle was not registered and
due registration certificate having not been obtained in accordance
with section 39 of the Act of 1988, the owner committed breach of the
policy condition and the liability upon the insurance company was
held to be unsustainable. The insurance company was directed to pay
and recover from the owner by instituting appropriate proceedings.