Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 17 (0.36 seconds)National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011
In view of the facts and circumstances of the present case and
in view of decision of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of "National
Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors." mentioned supra, a
sum of Rs. 15,000/ each is awarded in favour of petitioners on account of
loss of estate and funeral expenses.
Section 166 in The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 [Entire Act]
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance ... vs Pooja & Ors. on 2 November, 2017
33. After the celebrated judgment of "National Insurance
Company Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors.", mentioned supra, Hon'ble Delhi
High Court in appeal titled as "Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company
Ltd. Vs. Pooja & Ors", mentioned supra, has been pleased to observe in
para 18 of the judgment that the constitution bench decision in Pranay Sethi
(supra) does not recognize any other nonpecuniary head of damages.
Hence, no amount of compensation is being awarded under this head.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
The Minimum Wages Act, 1948
New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs M/S. Hira Lal Ramesh Chand & Ors on 13 June, 2008
In the case titled as "New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Vs. Unnmalai & Ors.", 2012 ACJ 504(Mad), Cleaner came in contact with
Sh. Ram Dayal & Anr. Vs. Tata AIG Gen Ins. Co Ltd. & Ors. Page 8 of 27
MACP No. 4662/16 (Old No. 265/14) FIR No. 473/13.; PS Alipur DOD: 04.02.2019
live electric wire and was electrocuted while unloading grinders from the
roof of the vehicle. It was held that accident had taken place because of
negligence of driver who stopped the vehicle near high intensity electric
wire and allowed the cleaner to go to roof top for unloading those grinders.
Claim petition filed u/s. 166/140 M.V. Act was held to be maintainable in
said case.