Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.18 seconds)
Jahanavi Saini vs Department Of Personnel And Training on 6 January, 2025 cites

Indra Sawhney Etc. Etc vs Union Of India And Others, Etc. Etc. on 16 November, 1992

"D. That exclusion of persons falling in Creamy Layer is aimed at not giving reservation to persons who are no more backward. Any legislature or executive action to remove such persons individually or collectively cannot be constitutionally invalid. Rather, it is in consonance with the principle laid down by the Supreme Court in the matter of Indra Sawhney vs UOI.
Supreme Court of India Cites 136 - Cited by 1429 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Ashoka Kumar Thakur vs Union Of India & Ors on 10 April, 2008

E. That Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of "Ashok Kumar Thakur vs Union of India", reported as (2008) 6 SCC 1, held that the Government should not proceed on the basis that once a class is considered as a backward class it should continue to be a backward class for all times. Such an approach would defeat the very purpose of the reservation because once a class reaches a stage of progress which is referred to as take off stage then competition is necessary for their future progress."
Supreme Court of India Cites 205 - Cited by 929 - K G Balakrishnan - Full Document
1