Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)

Dudhiben Muljibhai Patel & vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 26 February, 2016

6.1 Besides said submission learned advocate for the respondent No. 1 also submitted that even otherwise the proceedings instituted by present petitioner are not maintainable in view of the fact that the petitioner approached concerned authority by way of appeal / revision against entry after 7 years and that therefore the proceedings instituted by the petitioner after such abnormal and inordinate delay could not have been entertained by the Mamlatdar. He submitted that the petitioner did not even prefer application for condonation of delay and in absence of request to condone delay the authority could not have entertained the application / appeal filed by present petitioner. To support his submission learned advocate for the respondent No. 1 relied on the decision in case between Dudhiben Muljibhai Patel vs. State of Gujarat 2016 (2) GLR 1786.
Gujarat High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 53 - N V Anjaria - Full Document
1