Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Dudhiben Muljibhai Patel & vs State Of Gujarat & 4 on 26 February, 2016
6.1 Besides said submission learned advocate for the
respondent No. 1 also submitted that even otherwise the
proceedings instituted by present petitioner are not
maintainable in view of the fact that the petitioner
approached concerned authority by way of appeal /
revision against entry after 7 years and that therefore the
proceedings instituted by the petitioner after such
abnormal and inordinate delay could not have been
entertained by the Mamlatdar. He submitted that the
petitioner did not even prefer application for condonation
of delay and in absence of request to condone delay the
authority could not have entertained the application /
appeal filed by present petitioner. To support his
submission learned advocate for the respondent No. 1
relied on the decision in case between Dudhiben Muljibhai
Patel vs. State of Gujarat 2016 (2) GLR 1786.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1