Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.17 seconds)
Lal Chandra Maurya vs Union Of India on 4 October, 2018 cites

Dhanpal And Others vs State Of U.P. And Others on 9 October, 2013

In view of the facts and circumstances as discussed above, we are of the opinion that the decision as mentioned in the impugned order dated 22.2.2010 (Annexure A-1) regarding validity of Adhikari Pariksha of Gurukal Viswavidyalaya, Vrindavan passed by the applicant in 2001 is not in accordance with the judgment dated 9.10.2013 of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Dhanpal and others (supra) as well as the letters of Madhyamika Shiksha Parisad, Allahabad enclosed with the counter affidavit of the official respondents. However, we are not inclined to interfere with the order dated 22.2.2010 in the light of the discussions in para 13 of this order.
Allahabad High Court Cites 32 - Cited by 13 - S Misra - Full Document

Smt.Nirmala Parmar vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 January, 2017

8. Shri B.N. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant was heard. Besides reiterating the stand in the OA, Shri Singh filed copy of the judgments of Hon'ble Allahabad High Court in the case of Dhanpal and others vs. State of U.P. and others in Writ-A No. 48208/2012 and in the case of Smt. Nirja Parmar vs. State of U.P. & Others in Writ-A No. 68207/2011, in which it has been decided that the Adhikari Pariksha certificate of Gurukul Viswavidyalaya, Vrindavan, Mathura is valid upto the year 2008 if it is obtained with English as one of the subject and passed in one year. It was submitted that the respondents should not have rejected the candidature of the applicant who fulfills the above criteria.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 113 - Cited by 40 - Full Document
1