Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.25 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 482 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Union Of India vs Padam Narain Aggarwal Etc on 3 October, 2008
In this regard,
a useful reference can be made to the decisions of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of D.K. Ganesh
Babu Vs. P.T. Manokaran & Ors., reported in (2007)
4 SCC 434; in case of State of Maharashtra & Anr.
Vs. Mohd. Sajid Husain Mohd. S. Husain & Ors.,
reported in (2008) 1 SCC 213; and in case of Union
of India Vs. Padam Narain Aggarwal & Ors.,
reported in (2008) 13 SCC 305.
Pratibha Manchanda vs The State Of Haryana on 7 July, 2023
In case of Pratibha Manchanda and another Vs.
State of Haryana and another reported in (2023) 8
SCC 181, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Paragraph
No.21, observed as under:-
State Of M.P. & Anr vs Ram Krishna Balothia & Anr on 6 February, 1995
In State of M.P. & Anr. Vs. Ram Kishna Balothia &
Anr., reported in AIR 1995 SC 1198, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has considered the nature of the
right of anticipatory bail and observed as under:
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 2 December, 2010
19. Thus while taking into consideration the ratio
laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre (supra) as also
ratio laid down in other decisions as stated
above, I have gone through the contents of the
FIR, which is placed on record and also considered
the affidavit of the investigating officer filed
before the learned Judge concerned opposing the
Page 18 of 20
Uploaded by PATIL GAUTAMBHAI GOPALBHAI(HC00190) on Wed Oct 08 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 22:33:57 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/19489/2025 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
bail application preferred by the applicants. Upon
going through the contents of the FIR, it appears
that prima facie case is made out against the
applicants and material collected so far suggests
the involvement of the applicants in the
commission of crime.
Sumitha Pradeep vs Arun Kumar C.K on 21 October, 2022
18. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sumitha
Pradeep Vs. Arun Kumar C.K. & Anr., reported in
2022 SCC OnLine SC 1529 held that merely because
custodial interrogation was not required by itself
could not be a ground to grant anticipatory bail.
The first and the foremost thing the Court hearing
the anticipatory bail application is to consider
is the prima facie case against the accused. The
relevant extract of the judgment is reproduced
Page 16 of 20
Uploaded by PATIL GAUTAMBHAI GOPALBHAI(HC00190) on Wed Oct 08 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Oct 08 22:33:57 IST 2025
NEUTRAL CITATION
R/CR.MA/19489/2025 ORDER DATED: 03/10/2025
undefined
hereinbelow:-