Aman Singla vs Archit Singla on 9 March, 2022
The accused took defence that the cheque in
question bear his signature and he also filled the amount in words
and figures but remaining particulars were not filled by him, he did
not receive legal notice, however the same bears his correct address,
he is not the proprietor of Shyam Timber Store but his father was
the proprietor, the said firm is not operative after death of his father,
he borrowed loan of Rs.5,00,000/- from complainant in the
beginning and repaid the total sum of Rs.1,80,000/- in cash in 2-3
instances to complainant, after that he had handed over the cheques
in issue as security to the complainant, he is not able to work and
Ct. Case No. 3599/2020
Krishan Lal Singla v. Amit Singla
Page 6 of 22
therefore unable to pay, he admitted his liability to the tune of
Rs.3,20,000/-.