Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.24 seconds)Arulvelu & Anr vs State Rep By Public Prosecutor & Anr on 7 October, 2009
In Arulvelu v. State reported in 2009 (10) SCC 206, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, at Paragraph 29, explained what "perverse" means,
29.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959
State Of Andhra Pradesh vs Abdul Khuddus (Dead) By Lrs & Ors on 29 November, 2007
In State of A.P., v. Abdul Khuddus reported in 2007 (15) SCC 261, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, at Paragraph 12, held that,
"we are unable to sustain the order of the High Court, which had set aside the findings of fact arrived at by the Special Court, which, in our view, were arrived at on consideration of the materials on record and which, by any stretch of imagination, cannot be said to be based on no evidence or surmises or conjectures and therefore, it was not open to the High Court, in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction, to set aside the findings of fact arrived at by the Special Court which were based on sound consideration of the materials on record."
Kuldeep Singh vs The Commissioner Of Police & Ors on 17 December, 1998
In Kuldeep Singh v. The Commissioner of Police, (1999) 2 SCC 10, the
Court while dealing with the scope of Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution observed as under:
Gen.Manager,Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors vs Daya Singh on 28 July, 2010
In The General Manager (P) Punjab & Sind Bank v. Daya Singh reported in (2010) 11 SCC 233, at Paragraph 24, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, held as follows:
S.R.Tewari vs Union Of India & Anr on 28 May, 2013
In S.R.Tiwari v. Union of India reported in 2013 (6) SCC 602, at Paragraph 30, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, held as follows:
M.S. Narayanagouda vs Girijamma And Anr. on 30 August, 1976
In M. S. Narayanagouda v. Girijamma & Another AIR 1977 Kar. 58, the Court observed that any order made in conscious violation of pleading and law is a perverse order.