Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (1.49 seconds)

M/S Dundlod Shikshan Sansthan & Anr. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 28 July, 2015

This decision therefore would not apply in the present case.” In Dundlod Shikshan Sanasthan v Union of India reported in 284 CTR 175 (RAJ) “8. In the present case, the fee was levied under Section 200 for late filing of the returns, prior to the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2015 with effect from 1.6.2015 in Sections 200A, 246A and 272A providing for computation and appeal. We do not find that even prior to these amendments the imposition of fee was illegal. We do not in exercise of the power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India find any valid reasons or justification to interfere with the compensatory fees imposed for late filing of the TDS returns on flat rates.” Page 9 of 15 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Rajasthan High Court - Jaipur Cites 14 - Cited by 68 - S Ambwani - Full Document
1   2 Next