Lingappa Pochanna Appelwar And Ors vs State Of Maharashtra And Anr. Etc on 4 December, 1984
(1). Lingapaa Pochanna Appelwar vs. State of Maharashtra and
Another reported in (1985) 1 SCC 479.
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.37 seconds)The Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs D. J. Bahadur & Ors on 10 November, 1980
(2). The Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. D.J.Bahadur and
Ors reported in AIR 1980 SC 2181(1).
U.P. State Electricity Board And Ors vs Hari Shanker Jain And Ors on 28 August, 1978
10.3. Applying the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
Page 19 of 21
C/SCA/5509/2017 JUDGMENT
as well as this Hon'ble Court and the Andhra Pradesh High Court in
the aforesaid decisions to the facts of the case on hand, more
particularly, as per the Regulation 2015 and even right from very
beginning i.e. since 1992 7% plots are to be reserved for SC
Category and 14% plots are to be reserved for ST Category and
even the Board in its meeting held on 12.08.2009 also shown the
concern and felt that there is marked reduction in plots available
for SC/ST, the respondent GMB is to be directed to put all the
vacant plots put to auction simultaneously.
Jamshed Hormusji Wadia vs Board Of Trustees, Port Of Mumbai & Anr on 13 January, 2004
(4). Jamshed Hormusji Wada vs. Board of Trustees, Port of
Mumbai and Another reported in (2004) 3 SCC 214.
Article 37 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 42 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 43 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 46 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 335 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Gedela Suryanarayana vs Chairman, Visakhapatnam Port Trust And ... on 28 November, 1995
10. Now, the next question which posed for the consideration of
Page 17 of 21
C/SCA/5509/2017 JUDGMENT
this Court is whether the GMB is right / justified in inviting the
bids with respect to few vacant plots and not all the vacant plots ?
As observed herein above, it is the case on behalf of the GMB and
so stated in the affidavit in reply that with a view to get maximum
price only few vacant plots shall be put to auction and rest of the
vacant plots shall be put to auction subsequently. The aforesaid is
not only contrary to the relevant Regulation 2015 but the same is
also contrary to the affidavit in reply filed by the GMB in earlier
round of litigation being Special Civil Application No. 7563 of
2011. Even otherwise, not to invite the bids even with respect to
the number of plots which are required to be reserved for SC/ST
Categories as per the Regulation, 2015 shall deprive them from
submitting the bids with respect to all the vacant plots. At this
stage, the observation made by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in
the case of Gedela Suryanarayan (supra) in Writ Petition No.
11614 of 1992 are required to be referred to. In para 11, the
Andhra Pradesh High Court has observed as under: