Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.42 seconds)Section 25 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25F in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25G in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Section 25H in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
Workmen Of Nilgiri Coop. Mkt.Society ... vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors on 5 February, 2004
POOJA
AGGARWAL Page No. 16 of 30
Digitally signed by
POOJA AGGARWAL
Date: 2024.06.07
04:38:49 +0530
who sets up a plea of existence of relationship of
employer and employee, the burden would be upon
him. In this regard, the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the
case of Workmen of Nilgiri Coop. Mkt. Society
Ltd. v. State of T.N., (2004) 3 SCC 514 has approved
the judgment of Kerala and Calcutta High Court,
where the plea of the workman that he was employee
of the company was denied by the company and it
was held that it was not for the company to prove
that he was not an employee. Para 48 to 50 of the
said judgment reads as under:--
N.C. John vs Secretary, Thodupuzha Taluk Shop And ... on 17 August, 1972
In N.C. John v. Secy., Thodupuzha Taluk
Shop and Commercial Establishment Workers'
Union, (1973 Lab IC 398) the Kerala High
Court held:
Balwant Rai Saluja & Anr Etc.Etc vs Air India Ltd.& Ors on 25 August, 2014
38.In Balwant Rai Saluja v. Air India Ltd., (2014) 9 SCC 407,
the Hon'ble Apex Court has enumerated the factors to be
considered to establish the existence of the employer-
employee relationship as under:
International Airport Authority Of ... vs International Air Cargo Workers' ... on 13 April, 2009
12. The expression `control and supervision' in the
context of contract labour was explained by this court
in International Airport Authority of India v.
International Air Cargo Workers Union [2009 (13)
SCC 374] thus: