Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.20 seconds)Section 379 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Aghnoo Nagesia vs State Of Bihar on 4 May, 1965
In Aghnu Nagesia Vs. State of Bihar, AIR 1966 SC 119, it was
held that "proof of the confession is prohibited by section 25."
Udai Bhan Rai vs State Of U.P. And Others on 25 January, 1994
Further, as noted in case titled Puluduri Kotayya Case and In
Udai Bhan Vs. State of U.P.
The important ingredients of this Section have been summoned up
as under:
(1)The fact of which evidence is sought to be given must be
FIR No157/10 State Vs. Sanjay Under Section379/411/482 IPC
12
relevant to the issue. It must be borne in mind that the
provision has nothing to do with question of relevancy. The
relevancy of the fact discovered must be established
according to the prescriptions relating to relevancy of other
evidence connecting it with the crime in order to make the
fact discovered admissible.