Mridul Kumar Sharma vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 13 August, 2015
9. A Division Bench of the Court in the case of Mridul Kumar
Sharma Vs. State of M.P. reported in ILR 2015 MP 2556 has held that
mere filing of a representation does not give rise to a vested right and it
is the prerogative of the employer to stay or not to stay the transfer order
during the pendency of the representation. In case if the transfer order is
not stayed by the employer then it has to be executed by the employee.
Accordingly, it was held that in absence of any vested right, the High
Court should not pass an interim order thereby staying the execution of
transfer.