M.D. Raveendran vs T.Devarajan (Dead) Lr'S on 8 January, 2014
The petitioner had submitted Ext.P1
application for replacement of the vehicle in
respect of a regular permit which he has in his
favour. According to the petitioner, the
application is not being considered on the
ground that the vehicle does not belong to the
petitioner. By the judgment in M.Raveendran v.
R.T.O. & another (1995 (1) KLJ 96) this Court
had considered this matter and has found that it
is enough that the applicant have a valid
agreement for holding the vehicle.