Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.47 seconds)
Karma Recruitments Pvt. Ltd.,, ... vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2),, ... on 24 June, 2019
cites
The Advocates Act, 1961
Section 139 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 148 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Section 154 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. vs P. Surendra Prabhu on 21 September, 2005
In terms of the law laid down by this Court in the case of CIT v. Surendra
Prabhu P. 2005 (59) KLJ 609 on which reliance is placed by learned counsel
for the petitioner it does points out that in respect of any payment received by
a person seeking voluntary retirement the first five lakhs rupees is exempt
under section 10(10C) of the Act and in respect of balance of the amount, the
tax deducted is not justified as the balance amount is one which entitles for
exemption within the permissible limit.
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 153 in The Income Tax Act, 1961 [Entire Act]
Sri A. Balakrishnan S/O Late Appaswamy vs The General Manager, Hindustan Machine ... on 1 February, 2007
6. We find the issue in appeal is squarely covered, in favour of the assessee, by
Hon'ble Karnataka High Court's judgment in the case of A. Balakrishnan Vs.
Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd [(2007) 290 ITR 227 (Kar)] wherein it has been, inter
alia, observed as follows:-