Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.29 seconds)Section 42 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 57 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan vs Parmanand And Anr on 28 February, 2014
The appellants cannot be given any benefit out of the aforesaid ruling of Parmanand's case due to well settled legal position that the provisions of Section 50 of the Act do not apply to any search or seizure where the article was not being carried on the person of the accused (State of Rajasthan Vs. Tara Singh; (2011) 11 SCC 559).
Dilip & Anr vs State Of M.P on 24 November, 2006
The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dilip Vs. State of M.P. (2007)1 SCC 450 has held that if a police officer without any prior information as contemplated under the provisions of N.D.P.S. Act makes a raid or arrest a person in the normal course of investigation into an offence or suspected offence and when search is completed, at that stage, Section 50 of N.D.P.S. Act would not be attracted and the question of complying with the requirement thereunder would not arise. Though almost all the witnesses have admitted that no written consent was taken from the accused before taking search, it does not make any difference and only on this basis the trial cannot be vitiated.
Jarnail Singh & Ors. Etc vs State Of Punjab & Ors on 7 May, 1986
In Jarnail Singh Vs. State of Punjab; AIR 2011 SC 964, the Hon'ble Apex court has held :