Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.20 seconds)Section 47 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Jagroop Singh vs State Of U.P. And Another on 13 February, 2020
10. This Court in Jagroop Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Others [Writ C No. 20752/2015 decided on 15.07.2024] has held that in absence of compliance of rule 7(3)(c) of the Rules, the impugned order cannot be justified. The relevant paragraphs are quoted below:-
Section 7 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 56 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Section 75 in The Indian Stamp Act, 1899 [Entire Act]
Charan Singh And Ors vs State Of Uttar Pradesh on 10 March, 2004
In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance on the judgements of this Court in Jagroop Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Others [Writ C No. 20752/2015 decided on 15.07.2024], M/s Uttaranchal Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCRA & Others [Writ C No. 12727/2012, decided on 06.03.2024] and Charan Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others [Writ C No. 58674/2014, decided on 29.05.2024].
Smt. Pushpa Sareen vs State Of U.P. on 12 February, 2015
12. This Court notices that after the notices were issued and the Collector had fixed date inviting objections, the Collector failed to fix any further date for spot inspection or for any further oral or documentary evidence and therefore, it cannot be said that the Collector at all undertook any effort to act in accordance with the procedure prescribed in the matter. The conclusion drawn therefore, is devoid of any cogent and convincing material in support there of and the findings therefore, are liable to be held as perverse. The said rule which has been quoted herein above, has also drawn attention of Full Bench in Smt. Pushpa Sarin v. State of U.P. 2015 (127) RD 855. However, the Full Bench did not delve into the issue any further regarding the scope and applicability of the Rules because the period which was in dispute under the reference was prior to the rule coming into force. Para 18 of the judgment of Full Bench runs as under:
Grand Toyota Uttaranchal Automobiles ... vs Virendra Kumar Chadha & Others on 28 November, 2018
In support of his submissions, he has placed reliance on the judgements of this Court in Jagroop Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 2 Others [Writ C No. 20752/2015 decided on 15.07.2024], M/s Uttaranchal Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCRA & Others [Writ C No. 12727/2012, decided on 06.03.2024] and Charan Singh Vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others [Writ C No. 58674/2014, decided on 29.05.2024].
1