Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.24 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 404 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Padala Veera Reddy vs State Of Andhra Pradesh And Others on 26 October, 1989
In Padala Veera Reddy v. State of A.P. {AIR
1990 SC 79} it was laid down that when a case
rests upon circumstantial evidence, such evidence
must satisfy the following tests:
(1) the circumstances from which an inference of
guilt is sought to be drawn, must be cogently and
firmly established;
Hukam Singh And Ors vs State Of Rajasthan on 14 September, 2000
(See Hukam
Singh v. State of Rajasthan {AIR 1977 SC 1063],
Eradu v. State of Hyderabad {AIR 1956 SC 316},
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka {AIR 1983
SC 446}, State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi {AIR 1985 SC
1224}, Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab {AIR
1987 SC 350} and Ashok Kumar
Chatterjee v. State of M.P. {AIR 1989 SC 1890}
The circumstances from which an inference as to
the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be
proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be
shown to be closely connected with the principal
fact sought to be inferred from those
circumstances.
State Of U.P. vs Sukhbasi And Ors. on 10 May, 1985
(See Hukam
Singh v. State of Rajasthan {AIR 1977 SC 1063],
Eradu v. State of Hyderabad {AIR 1956 SC 316},
Earabhadrappa v. State of Karnataka {AIR 1983
SC 446}, State of U.P. v. Sukhbasi {AIR 1985 SC
1224}, Balwinder Singh v. State of Punjab {AIR
1987 SC 350} and Ashok Kumar
Chatterjee v. State of M.P. {AIR 1989 SC 1890}
The circumstances from which an inference as to
the guilt of the accused is drawn have to be
proved beyond reasonable doubt and have to be
shown to be closely connected with the principal
fact sought to be inferred from those
circumstances.
Bhagat Ram vs State Of Punjab on 9 February, 1954
In Bhagat Ram v. State of
Punjab {AIR 1954 SC 621} it was laid down that
where the case depends upon the conclusion
drawn from circumstances the cumulative effect
of the circumstances must be such as to negative
the innocence of the accused and bring home the
offences beyond any reasonable doubt.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Bodh Raj @ Bodha And Ors vs State Of Jammu And Kashmir on 3 September, 2002
A perusal of the judgment of the trial Court reveals
a clear mention and observation by the learned judge
that the entire case rests upon circumstantial evidence
and in such a case, all the circumstances have
reasonably to be proved as per the decisions of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case between
Sharad Biridhichand Sarda Vs. State of
Maharashtra3 and in the case between Bodh Raj Vs.
State of Jammu & Kashmir4.
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda vs State Of Maharashtra on 17 July, 1984
A perusal of the judgment of the trial Court reveals
a clear mention and observation by the learned judge
that the entire case rests upon circumstantial evidence
and in such a case, all the circumstances have
reasonably to be proved as per the decisions of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court rendered in the case between
Sharad Biridhichand Sarda Vs. State of
Maharashtra3 and in the case between Bodh Raj Vs.
State of Jammu & Kashmir4.