Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.26 seconds)State Of Punjab vs Dharam Singh on 2 February, 1968
In the State of Punjab vs. Dharam Singh, 1987 SCC
(Cri.) 621 : 1987 Supp. SCC 89 , the Honourable Supreme Court
held that the High Court had erred in quashing the FIR by going
beyond the averments, to consider the merits of the case even
before the investigating agency has embarked upon the legal
exercise of collecting evidence.
Kurukshetra University And Anr. vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 22 March, 1977
In Kurukshetra University vs. State of Haryana,
(1977) 4 SCC 451 : AIR 1977 SC 2229 (a Three Judges
Bench), the Honourable Supreme Court has observed thus:-
Geeta Mehrotra & Anr vs State Of U.P. & Anr on 17 October, 2012
In Geeta Mehrotra and another vs. State of Uttar
Pradesh and another, (2012) 10 SCC 741 , the Honourable
Supreme Court has held that in the absence of any specific
allegation and an FIR, prima facie, indicating no case against the
co-accused, the Court oould have the pooer to quash an FIR.
Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai ... vs The State Of Gujarat on 4 October, 2017
In Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai
Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another, (2017)
5
::: Uploaded on - 30/03/2021 ::: Downloaded on - 03/09/2021 09:31:16 :::
902-CrWP-1056-2019.odt
9 SCC 641, the Honourable Supreme Court has laid doon the
guiding principles to be considered in determining ohether an FIR
could be quashed, as under:-
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Superintendent Of Police, C.B.I. And ... vs Tapan Kr. Singh on 10 April, 2003
In C.B.I. vs. Tapan Kumar Singh, (2003) 6 SCC
175 : AIR 2003 SC 4140, the Honourable Supreme Court has held
in paragraph 22 that "The lao does not require the mentioning of
all the ingredients of the offence in the FIR. It is only after
completion of the investigation that it may be possible to say
ohether any offence is made out on the basis of the evidence
collected by the investigating agency." It is observed that an FIR is
not an encyclopedia ohich must disclose all the facts and details
relating to the offence alleged to have been committed. It requires
no debate that an FIR is merely a report by the informant about the
commission of a cognizable offence and it cannot be ruled out that
minute details may not be mentioned. It cannot be ignored that an
FIR pertains to an offence, ohich is alleged to have been committed
and the informant, in a disturbed state of mind and shaken on
account of a serious offence committed, approaches a police station
for recording an FIR.