Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.25 seconds)
Mukesh @ Munesh Kumar vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others on 24 September, 2019 cites

State Of Punjab And Ors vs Jagjit Singh And Ors on 26 October, 2016

Consequently, the writ petition succeeds and is allowed. The order impugned dated 15th November, 2017, passed by the respondent no. 2, stands quashed. A direction is issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for being paid minimum of pay-scale keeping in view the specific directions of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others (supra), Sabha Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and others, Civil Appeal No. 10956 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 1045 of 2016), as also the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) and Special Appeal Defective No. 231 of 2019. Specific order in that regard would be passed by the respondent no. 2, within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order before him."
Supreme Court of India Cites 54 - Cited by 2405 - J S Khehar - Full Document

Sabha Shanker Dube vs Divisional Forest Officer on 14 November, 2018

Since the order impugned is found to be in teeth of the observations of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Sabha Shanker (supra), and the Division Bench Judgment relied upon in the order impugned since has been quashed by the Apex Court in the case of Sabha Shanker (supra), this petition is also disposed of in terms of the order dated 07.08.2019, passed in Writ Petition No. 6281 of 2019. Required consideration would be made within a period of two months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 324 - L N Rao - Full Document

Mohan Swaroop And Another vs State Of U.P. on 8 July, 2010

Consequently, the writ petition succeeds and is allowed. The order impugned dated 15th November, 2017, passed by the respondent no. 2, stands quashed. A direction is issued to the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners for being paid minimum of pay-scale keeping in view the specific directions of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others (supra), Sabha Shanker Dube Vs. Divisional Forest Officer and others, Civil Appeal No. 10956 of 2018 (arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 1045 of 2016), as also the judgment of this Court in Writ Petition No. 11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and another Vs. State of U.P. and 3 others) and Special Appeal Defective No. 231 of 2019. Specific order in that regard would be passed by the respondent no. 2, within a period of six weeks from the date of presentation of a certified copy of this order before him."
Allahabad High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 31 - B N Shukla - Full Document

Satya Pal Singh, Shanti Swaroop And ... vs State Of U.P. And Ors. on 20 May, 2005

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy raised in the present writ petition has otherwise been answered by this Court in Writ Petition No.11964 of 2018 (Mohan Swaroop and another vs. State of U.P. and others) decided on 17.11.2018, against which a Special Appeal Defective No.231 of 2019 filed has also been disposed of partially modifying the order of learned Single Judge. Submission is that since petitioners are identically placed, the authorities are illegally withholding the benefits.
Allahabad High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 22 - P Srivastava - Full Document

State Of U.P. And Ors. vs Putti Lal on 21 February, 2002

The Principal Chief Conservation of Forest, vide his order dated 15th November, 2017, has rejected claim of the petitioners by observing that earlier adjudication by the Apex Court in the case of State of U.P. & Others Vs. Putti Lal reported in 2006 (9) SCC 337, was only for the petitioners before the Supreme Court and that the direction therein cannot be extended to other persons by relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others (supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 326 - Full Document

Vinod Kumar P.R vs Range Forest Officer on 8 August, 2006

The petitioners are the daily wagers working with the Forest Department. They are claiming wages equivalent to the minimum of the pay scale of Class-IV employee in the Forest Department as enumerated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Punjab and others Vs. Jagjit Singh and others reported in (2017) 1 SCC 148 and by a Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Vinod Kumar Vs. The Divisional Forest Officer and others (Special Appeal No.48 of 2012) dated 2.1.2017.
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 4 - Full Document
1