Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.30 seconds)Section 10 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
State Of West Bengal vs Administrator, Howrah Municipality & ... on 14 December, 1971
11. It
is also appropriate to refer to the decision, the Apex Court in the
case between State of West Bengal Vs. The Administrator, Howrah
Municipality wherein the Apex Court considered the issue whether the
expression "sufficient cause" should receive liberal
construction.
Section 30 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923
Ramlal, Motilal And Chhotelal vs Rewa Coalfields Ltd on 4 May, 1961
In the said decision, the Apex Court referred to the
earlier judgment in the case between Ramlal Vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
(AIR 1962 SC 361) wherein it has been pointed out:-
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 4 in The Employee's Compensation Act, 1923 [Entire Act]
Shakuntala Devi Jain vs Kuntal Kumari And Ors. on 5 September, 1968
12. A
court knows that refusal to condone delay would result foreclosing
a suitor from putting forth his cause. There is no presumption that
delay in approaching the court is always deliberate. This
Court has held that the words "sufficient cause" under
Section 5 of the Limitation Act should receive a liberal construction
so as to advance substantial justice vide Shakuntala Devi Jain Vs.
Kuntal Kumari [AIR 1969 SC 575] and State of West Bengal Vs. The
Administrator, Howrah Municipality [AIR 1972 SC 749]."
1