Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 37 (0.28 seconds)Section 27 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948
Section 5 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition And development) Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. And ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 21 July, 1983
The Parliament has a full control over the delegated legislation. This aspect is dealt in para 17 of the judgment referring to the case of Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. (Cited supra), which reads as follows:
Section 14 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
State Of M.P vs Mahalaxmi Fabric Mills Limited & Ors on 1 February, 1995
Shri Mehadia specifically submitted that in the case of State of M.P. v. Mahalaxmi Fabric Mills Ltd. and Ors. , the cases reported in N.K. Papiah & Sons v. Excise Commissioner , and Delhi Cloth & General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Union of India are referred. The case before their Lordships was under Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act (7 of 1957). It is observed that Section 9(3) of the Act does not suffer from any excessive deletation of legislative power. Their Lordships in para 15 of the judgment observed: