Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.62 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Rajasthan vs Kishore on 27 February, 1996
: State of Rajasthan Vs. Kishore
(1996) 8 SCC 217; Union of India Vs. Prakash P. Hinduja &
Anr. (2003) 6 SCC 195; Amar Singh Vs. Balvinder Singh & Anr.
(2003) 2 SCC 518; Ram Bihari Yadav Vs. State of Bihar (1998)
4 SCC 517].
Union Of India vs Prakash P. Hinduja & Anr on 7 July, 2003
: State of Rajasthan Vs. Kishore
(1996) 8 SCC 217; Union of India Vs. Prakash P. Hinduja &
Anr. (2003) 6 SCC 195; Amar Singh Vs. Balvinder Singh & Anr.
(2003) 2 SCC 518; Ram Bihari Yadav Vs. State of Bihar (1998)
4 SCC 517].
Amar Singh vs Balwinder Singh & Ors on 31 January, 2003
: State of Rajasthan Vs. Kishore
(1996) 8 SCC 217; Union of India Vs. Prakash P. Hinduja &
Anr. (2003) 6 SCC 195; Amar Singh Vs. Balvinder Singh & Anr.
(2003) 2 SCC 518; Ram Bihari Yadav Vs. State of Bihar (1998)
4 SCC 517].
Ram Bihari Yadav vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 21 April, 1998
: State of Rajasthan Vs. Kishore
(1996) 8 SCC 217; Union of India Vs. Prakash P. Hinduja &
Anr. (2003) 6 SCC 195; Amar Singh Vs. Balvinder Singh & Anr.
(2003) 2 SCC 518; Ram Bihari Yadav Vs. State of Bihar (1998)
4 SCC 517].
Section 392 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Vadivelu Thevar vs The State Of Madras(With Connected ... on 12 April, 1957
In reference to probative value of testimony of sole eye-
witness, Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vadivelu Thevar Vs. State of
Madras AIR 1957 SC 614 observed that the following
propositions are firmly established -
Section 397 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1