Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 20 (0.35 seconds)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd vs M.K.J. Corporation on 21 August, 1996

19. On the principle of acting in good faith, it is held by this Court in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M.K.J. Corporation (1996) 6 SCC 428, that it is the primary duty of the parties to a contract to do so, "(6) It is a fundamental principle of Insurance law that utmost good faith must be observed by the contracting parties. Good faith forbids either party from concealing (non-disclosure) what he privately knows, to draw the other into a bargain, from his ignorance of that fact and his believing the contrary. Just as the insured has a duty to disclose, "similarly, it is the duty of the insurers and their agents to disclose all material facts within their knowledge, since obligation of good faith applies to them equally with the assured."
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 169 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

United India Insurance Co.Ltd vs M/S.Harchand Rai Chandan Lal on 24 September, 2004

"7. The basic issue which has been canvassed on behalf of the appellant before this Court is that the conditions of exclusion under the policy document were not handed over to the appellant by the insurer and in the absence of the appellant being made aware of the terms of the exclusion, it is not open to the insurer to rely upon the exclusionary clauses. Hence, it was urged that the decision in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Harchand Rai Chandan Lal, (2004) 8 SCC 644, will have no application since there was no dispute in that case that the policy document was issued to the insured.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 320 - A K Mathur - Full Document

B.L. Sreedhar & Ors vs K.M. Munireddy (Dead) And Ors on 5 December, 2002

21. To substantiate this plea learned counsel placed reliance on Dawsons Bank Ltd. vs. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish, AIR 1935 Privy Council 79; Bennet Coleman & Co. vs. Punya Priya Das Gupta, AIR 1970 SC 426; Associated Cement Companies Ltd. vs. The State of Rajasthan, AIR 1981 Rajasthan 133; Vasant Kumar Radhakishan Vora vs. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, AIR 1991 SC 14; B. L. Sreedhar & Ors vs. K. M. Munireddy (Dead) and Ors., AIR 2003 SC 578; Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Raja Vasireddy Komalavalli ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS 13 2025:HHC:31638 Kamba & Ors., (1984) 2 SCC 719; Sasadhar Chakravarty & Anr.
Supreme Court of India Cites 23 - Cited by 173 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Life Insurance Corporation Of India vs Raja Vasireddy Komallavalli Kamba & ... on 27 March, 1984

21. To substantiate this plea learned counsel placed reliance on Dawsons Bank Ltd. vs. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish, AIR 1935 Privy Council 79; Bennet Coleman & Co. vs. Punya Priya Das Gupta, AIR 1970 SC 426; Associated Cement Companies Ltd. vs. The State of Rajasthan, AIR 1981 Rajasthan 133; Vasant Kumar Radhakishan Vora vs. The Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay, AIR 1991 SC 14; B. L. Sreedhar & Ors vs. K. M. Munireddy (Dead) and Ors., AIR 2003 SC 578; Life Insurance Corporation of India vs. Raja Vasireddy Komalavalli ::: Downloaded on - 15/09/2025 21:27:42 :::CIS 13 2025:HHC:31638 Kamba & Ors., (1984) 2 SCC 719; Sasadhar Chakravarty & Anr.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 175 - S Mukharji - Full Document

M/S Modern Insulators Ltd vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd on 22 February, 2000

Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 337 - Full Document
1   2 Next