Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.45 seconds)

Moti Lal vs Emperor on 24 July, 1939

In Mohan Lal v. Emperor: AIR 1941 Bombay 149, it was observed that ―[t]he panchnama is merely a record of what a panch sees..‖ Similarly, the Gujarat High Court in the case of Valibhai Omarji v. The State: AIR 1963 Guj 145 noted that ―[a] Panchanama is essentially a document recording certain things which occur in the presence of Panchas and which are seen and heard by them.‖ Again in The State of Maharashtra v. Kacharadas D. Bhalgar: (1978) 80 BomLR 396, a panchnama was stated to be ―a memorandum of what happens in the presence of the panchas as seen by them and of what they hear‖.
Allahabad High Court Cites 20 - Cited by 8 - Full Document

Valibhai Omarji vs The State on 13 February, 1962

In Mohan Lal v. Emperor: AIR 1941 Bombay 149, it was observed that ―[t]he panchnama is merely a record of what a panch sees..‖ Similarly, the Gujarat High Court in the case of Valibhai Omarji v. The State: AIR 1963 Guj 145 noted that ―[a] Panchanama is essentially a document recording certain things which occur in the presence of Panchas and which are seen and heard by them.‖ Again in The State of Maharashtra v. Kacharadas D. Bhalgar: (1978) 80 BomLR 396, a panchnama was stated to be ―a memorandum of what happens in the presence of the panchas as seen by them and of what they hear‖.
Gujarat High Court Cites 8 - Cited by 14 - J M Shelat - Full Document
1   2 3 Next