Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.52 seconds)
Binod Kumar Mishra And Ors vs The State Of Bihar And Ors on 15 May, 2023 cites

Binit Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 21 August, 2017

40. This Court is of the considered opinion that there is an adjudication of this Court present in the case of Binit Kumar and others (Supra) as regards paragraph 5(ii) of the Resolution No. 3111 dated 25.03.2014 issued by the Department of Finance, Government of Bihar which is conclusive and final not only with regard to the actual matter but as to every other matter which the parties may ought to have litigated. Whether clause 5(ii) gives effect to the de-merger of the Accounts Cadre Posts with retrospective effect or not and what will be the impact of the same was essentially connected to the subject matter and the parties had an opportunity to challenge the said provision but instead of doing that they chose to rely upon the said resolution and got benefit of the same.
Patna High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 17 - J Saran - Full Document

Binod Kumar Mishra @ Binod Kumar Mishr vs The State Of Bihar Through Principal ... on 28 June, 2021

8. It is worth mentioning that in one of the writ applications being CWJC No. 9957 of 2017 (Binod Kumar Mishra versus the State of Bihar and others), Mr. Abhinav Shrivastava, learned counsel representing the petitioners has submitted that so far as the petitioners in the present case are concerned, they were appointed after 28.09.1999 but before 20.12.2000. It is his submission that these petitioners were entitled to be appointed against the post of Upper Division Clerk because the decision of the State Government with respect to the demerger of the post of clerical cadre had been given effect to only on 20.12.2000. His further submission is that unfortunately, the Cabinet decision taken in the meeting held on 27.09.1999 pursuant to which letter was also issued on the same date by the Finance Department proposing to effect the demerger of the clerical cadre but actually demerger Patna High Court CWJC No.6277 of 2020 dt.17-05-2023 10/34 never took place prior to issuance of Letter No. 8825 dated 20.12.2000 issued by the Finance Department.
Patna High Court Cites 29 - Cited by 5 - S Kumar - Full Document

The State Of Bihar & Ors vs Ram Janam Jha & Ors on 25 April, 2014

25. The judgment of the writ court in the case of Ram Janam Jha & Ors. came to be challenged in L.P.A. No. 206 of 2014 (State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Ram Janam Jha & Ors.). Before the Hon'ble Division Bench, the State Government's Resolution no. 3111 (v) dated 25.03.2015 was placed. The Hon'ble Division Bench took note of the fact that the controversy as to the pay revision has been examined by the State Government in its resolution and the same has been resolved, dismissed the letters patent appeal.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 35 - S P Singh - Full Document

Mukesh Kumar & Ors vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 13 April, 2018

32. The petitioners in CWJC No. 6277 of 2020 have assailed Letter No. 1041 dated 07.02.2020 (Annexure '3' issued by the Additional Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar by which the representations filed by the petitioners in compliance of the order dated 29.08.2019 passed in CWJC No. 2469 of 2019 have been rejected. On perusal of Annexure '3', it would appear that the petitioners had submitted an application seeking compliance of the order dated 29.08.2019 passed in CWJC No. 2469 of 2019 (Mukesh Kumar and Others versus the State of Bihar and Others). The communication as contained in Annexure '3' reads as under:-
Patna High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 5 - A K Tripathi - Full Document
1