Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.17 seconds)

Radha @ Radhamani @ Radhachi vs State Of Kerala on 16 September, 2008

The grounds on which the transfer deed can be set aside was discussed by this court in Radhamani & others v. State of Kerala (2016 (1) KHC 9). The court in that case went to the extent of holding that it was not necessary that there should be a specific recital or stipulation that the transferee will provide basic amenities and physical need of the transferor. Thus even in the absence of such a recital, if the transferee fails to provide basic amenities and physical needs, the deed of transfer can be set aside.
Kerala High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 33 - Full Document

Subasini Santha Prakash vs The District Collector on 15 November, 2017

10. Section 23 clearly indicates that it can be considered in two parts. The first part is wherein the property is transferred by way of gift or otherwise, subject to the condition that the transferee shall provide basic amenities and physical needs to the transferor and such transferee refuses or fails to provide, a WPC No.2192/2021 6 presumption can be arrived at that the document was obtained by fraud, coercion or undue influence and thus can be declared as void. The first part of the Act is a case wherein he refuses to satisfy the basic amenities. and physical needs, or fails to provide such amenities. A Full Bench of this court in Subasini v. District Collector ( WA No.1460/2015) held that there must be a specific recital in the transfer deed or one which may be explicit from the terms of the document impliedly. It overruled the decision in Radhamani and others' case.
Madras High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 1 - R Mahadevan - Full Document
1