Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 25 (0.37 seconds)THE CONSTITUTION (FORTY-SECOND AMENDMENT) ACT, 1976
Chairman-Cum-M.D.,Coal India Ld.& Ors vs Ananta Saha & Ors on 6 April, 2011
Managing Director, Coal India Limited & Ors. V. Ananta
Saha and Others reported in (2011) 5 SCC 142 and the State
of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Prabhat Kumar, 2022
LiveLaw (SC) 736
The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Prabhat Kumar on 29 October, 2018
Managing Director, Coal India Limited & Ors. V. Ananta
Saha and Others reported in (2011) 5 SCC 142 and the State
of Uttar Pradesh and Others vs. Prabhat Kumar, 2022
LiveLaw (SC) 736
Union Of India And Ors vs Mohd. Ramzan Khan on 20 November, 1990
Following the
Ramzan Khan case [(1991) 1 SCC 588 :
Khem Chand vs The Union Of India And Others on 13 December, 1957
In Khem Chand v. Union of India
[1958 SCR 1080 : AIR 1958 SC 300 : (1958)
1 LLJ 167] it was held thus:
Bachhittar Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 7 March, 1962
In Bachhittar Singh v. State
of Punjab [AIR 1963 SC 395 : 1962 Supp (3)
SCR 713] another Constitution Bench held
that the departmental proceedings taken
against the Government servant are not
divisible into two compartments. There is
just one continuous proceeding though there
are two stages in it. The first is coming to a
conclusion on the evidence as to whether the
charges raised against the Government
servant have been established or not and the
second is reached only if it is found that they
are established. That stage deals with the
action to be taken against the Government
servant concerned. Therefore, from the stage
of service of the charge-sheet till the
imposition of punishment was considered to
be a continuous whole process consisting of
the proof of the charge and imposition of the
punishment on the proved charge.
M. N. Dasanna vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 2 May, 1973
In Dr
M.N. Dasanna v. State of A.P. [(1973) 2 SCC
378 at 383 : 1973 SCC (L&S) 521] a Bench
of three Judges held that the inquiry consists
of recording evidence, admitting documents
and generally completing the records upon
which the finding would be based. It is only
after all the material has been placed on
record by both the sides, the stage of
recording a finding would arise.
Khardah Co. Ltd vs Their Workmen on 2 May, 1963
In Khardah
Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen [(1964) 3 SCR
506 : AIR 1964 SC 719 : (1963) 2 LLJ 452]
a Bench of three Judges held that it is the
duty of the enquiry officer to record clearly
and precisely his conclusions and to indicate
briefly the reasons therefor, so that the
Industrial Tribunal can judge whether they
are basically erroneous or perverse. In that
case since the reasons were not specifically
recorded the Court quashed the order of
Patna High Court L.P.A No.822 of 2015(12) dt.29-11-2022
19/20
termination.
Union Of India vs H. C. Goel on 30 August, 1963
In Union of India v. H.C. Goel
[(1964) 4 SCR 718 : AIR 1964 SC 364 :