Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 19 in The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Dalpat Abasaheb Solunke And Ors. vs Dr. B.S. Mahajan And Ors. on 6 December, 1989
6. Further the respondents would contend that there is
no discriminatory treatment met out to the applicants nor
there is malafide intention ascribed to the Selection
Committee. He further referred to decision rendered by
the Hon'ble Apex Court in Dalpat Abasaheb Solunki &
Ors. Vs. B.S. Mahajan & Ors. that the scope of judicial
interference in the matter is limited.
Sachin Kumar vs Delhi Subordinate Service Selection ... on 3 March, 2021
12. Now, the question arises, whether the selection
process was vitiated due to the aforementioned
irregularities. The Hon'ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal No.
639/640 of 2021 as well as the SLP(C) No. 5785-
5786/2020 in Sachin Kumar Vs. DSSSB and Ors. vide
order dated 03.03.2021 discussed the gamut of issues
related to the cancellation of selection process when the
results are already been declared. Paras No. 2 and 57 of
the same read as under:-
Puneet Kumar And Ors vs State (Govt. Of Nct Delhi) And Anr on 7 February, 2022
3. The result was declared by the respondents. The
applicant was selected in the said result. However, the
respondents cancelled the selection process itself pursuant
to the said advertisement vide impugned Office Order
dated 16.04.2015 without assigning any reason. Learned
counsel for applicants would draw attention to a decision
of Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal in dated 01.02.2017
in OA No. 3941/2015, Puneet Kumar and Ors. Vs. The
Chief Secretary, Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.. He
would draw reference to paras 8.1 and 9 thereof which
read as under:-
1