Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.22 seconds)
Bharti Axa General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Yogesh Kumar And Ors on 4 July, 2018 cites

Smt. Rajesh And Others vs Rajbir Singh And Others on 29 January, 2010

In view of the law laid down in Rajesh and others vs. Rajbir Singh and others 2013 (3) RCR (Civil) 170 (SC), 30% increase was given towards future prospects. Out of this amount, 1/3rd deduction was made towards personal expenses. The age of the deceased was recorded as 48 years in the postmortem report Ex.P-2. No evidence was produced by the respondents to prove the fact that he age of the deceased was more than 48 years. Thus, it was presumed that he age of the deceased was 48 years at the time of her death.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 5161 - R Bindal - Full Document

Manoj vs Azad & Ors on 20 April, 2015

In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the judgment cited by the cross objector-claimant in Manoj Kumar Yadav's case (supra) would be of no help to them. After going through the judgments cited by both the parties, it transpires that in the present case, deduction of Rs.4,70,000/- made which the claimant had received towards medi claim from Vipul Medicorp has been rightly done.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 7 - N K Sanghi - Full Document

Shri Shaheed Ahmed vs Shri Shankaranarayana Bhat on 1 April, 2008

In that case reference was made to a judgment of Karnataka High Court in the case of Shaheed Ahmed vs. Shankaranarayana Bhat and another, 2008 (5) AIR Kar R 460 and a judgment of Kerala High Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Bijumon 2012 (1) RCR (Civil) 325, where it has been held that the amount received under medical insurance policy by the claimant cannot be deducted from the compensation amount to be awarded to the claimant.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 29 - M M Shantanagoudar - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs V.S.Bijumon on 6 December, 2010

In that case reference was made to a judgment of Karnataka High Court in the case of Shaheed Ahmed vs. Shankaranarayana Bhat and another, 2008 (5) AIR Kar R 460 and a judgment of Kerala High Court in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Bijumon 2012 (1) RCR (Civil) 325, where it has been held that the amount received under medical insurance policy by the claimant cannot be deducted from the compensation amount to be awarded to the claimant.
Kerala High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 18 - M N Krishnan - Full Document

The National Insurance Company Ltd vs Akber Badsha on 27 March, 2013

Reliance can be placed upon a judgment in Akber Badsha's case (supra), where it has been held that Insurance Company was entitled to set off the amount with respect to the medical bills which were received by the claimant under the medi claim policy. If the claimant keeps the medi claim policy intact than the entire payment of bills has to be reimbursed by the Tribunal but if the claimant chooses to obtain due amount under the medi claim policy than the deduction has to be made to the extent of the premium satisfied under the medi claim policy.
Kerala High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 18 - K Harilal - Full Document

National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011

However, in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme 6 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2018 23:05:43 ::: Cross Objections No. 163-CII of 2016 in/and FAO No. 581 of 2015 :7: Court of Indian in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and others passed in Spl Leave Petition (Civil) No. 25590 of 2014 decided on October 31, 2017, the award is modified as under:
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 10133 - K Kannan - Full Document

Shri Nagar Mal vs The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd on 19 January, 2018

The enhanced amount of compensation of Rs.4,30,568/- shall be payable within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. Then enhanced amount of compensation shall carry interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the claim petition, till its realization in view of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of "Shri Nagar Mal and others vs. The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. and others", Civil Appeal No. 448 of 2018 (decided on 19.01.2018). Remaining conditions of disbursal of amount shall remain unaltered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 174 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Shiela Avinashi & Ors. on 27 January, 2012

On this proposition, counsel for the Insurance Company has referred to a judgment of the High Court of Delhi in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. VS. Shiela Avinashi and others 2014 ACJ 320 and a judgment of the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Akber Badsha and others 2016 ACJ 807 to contend that the claimant would not be entitled to medical expenses in her claim under Motor Vehicles Act which had already been reimbursed to her under 5 of 7 ::: Downloaded on - 21-07-2018 23:05:43 ::: Cross Objections No. 163-CII of 2016 in/and FAO No. 581 of 2015 :6: medi claim policy. It was held that it would amount amount to double payment as well as unjust and unlawful enrichment.
Delhi High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - J R Midha - Full Document
1