Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.26 seconds)

Centrlal Board Of Sec.Education & Anr vs Aditya Bandopadhyay & Ors on 9 August, 2011

3. In response, the Public Information Officer had furnished the information as regard item No.1 and declined to issue any information with regard to item Nos.2, 3 and 4. As regards, item No.5, it was responded that the communication was oral and there was no written communication in that regard. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent No.2 had preferred an appeal under Section 19(3) of the RTI Act before the First Appellate Authority. First Appellate Authority by its order dated 23.08.2018, relying upon the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of CBSE and another Vs. Aditya Bhandopadyay reported in (2011) 8 SCC 497, more particularly relying on paragraph No.63 of the judgment , proceeded to -4- NC: 2026:KHC:2687 WP No. 7574 of 2020 HC-KAR dismiss the appeal upholding the response issued by the Information Authority. Being aggrieved, respondent No.2 preferred second appeal before the Karnataka Information Commission in KIC No.14441/APL/2018.
Supreme Court of India Cites 36 - Cited by 8906 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1