Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.19 seconds)

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs Shiv Kumar Joshi on 14 December, 1999

In so far as the employees' provident fund is concerned, copies of judgments, including those in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. Shiv Kumar Joshi (supra) and State Bank of Mysore vs. S. K. Vidya & Anr. (supra) have been placed on record, as per which, the complainants have tried to show that the matters pertaining to the provident fund were covered under the category of consumer disputes.  However, before discussing the orders passed in these judgments, it is necessary to know whether the amount in question was deducted from the gratuity amount or from the provident fund dues.  It also requires to be ascertained whether the controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 had already taken a decision on the application filed on behalf of the complainant before them, as stated in the memo of appeal filed by the OPs before the State Commission.
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 210 - Full Document

State Bank Of Mysore vs S.K. Vidya on 27 August, 2012

In so far as the employees' provident fund is concerned, copies of judgments, including those in Regional Provident Fund Commissioner vs. Shiv Kumar Joshi (supra) and State Bank of Mysore vs. S. K. Vidya & Anr. (supra) have been placed on record, as per which, the complainants have tried to show that the matters pertaining to the provident fund were covered under the category of consumer disputes.  However, before discussing the orders passed in these judgments, it is necessary to know whether the amount in question was deducted from the gratuity amount or from the provident fund dues.  It also requires to be ascertained whether the controlling authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 had already taken a decision on the application filed on behalf of the complainant before them, as stated in the memo of appeal filed by the OPs before the State Commission.
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 10 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

The New India Assurance Company Limited vs Sohan Lal And Others on 10 December, 2012

PER DR. B.C. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER             This revision petition has been filed under section 21(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned order dated 03.07.2013, passed by the Uttar Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (hereinafter referred to as 'the State Commission') in First Appeal No. 938/2009, "The New India Assurance Co. Limited vs. Mohan Lal Sethi", vide which, while allowing the appeal, the order dated 08.12.2008, passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Agra, allowing the consumer complaint No. 333/2007, filed by the present petitioner Mohan Lal Sethi was set aside and the complaint was ordered to be dismissed.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 16 - Cited by 18 - K Kannan - Full Document
1