Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.31 seconds)Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Tahir Khan @ Shakeel vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 August, 2005
In the instant case we do not find any such circumstances which may warrant review of the judgment in Tahir Khan @ Shakeel (supra).
Section 389 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987
Surinder Singh @ Shingara Singh vs State Of Punjab on 6 September, 2005
27. The very basis on which the reference court doubted the correctness of the judgment of the Division Bench of this Court, we do not find any material in support thereof and in either of the case relied upon the entitlement of a convict to seek suspension of sentence on long incarceration in jail was not under consideration and in our considered view the judgment of this Court in Tahir Khan @ Shakil (2005) 4 WLC 637 lays down broad guidelines which are to be kept in mind while considering bail application pending appeal and it lays no invariable rule for grant of bail on completion of specified period however it is discretionary like grant or refusal of bail but at the same time rule out any strait jacket formula and this what the Apex Court observed in Surinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2005 (7) SCC 387 which came after pronouncement of judgment by this Court, In our considered view the correctness of the division bench judgment in Tahir Khan @ Shakeel (supra) remain no more res integra to be examined by this Court after the judgment of Apex Court in Surinder Singh's case referred to supra.