Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.76 seconds)Sudarshan Lohia vs Uoi Through Chief Commissioner Of ... on 22 January, 2010
458. It was urged by learned counsel for respondent-complainant that
whether imputation of respondent-complainant stealing medicines from
MCD Hospital for his private clinic were made in good faith or not, is a
matter which is required to be seen at trial and not while exercising
jurisdiction under Section 482 of C.P.C. To contend so, reliance was
placed upon decisions in Chaudhari Parveen Sultana Vs. State of West
Bengal & Anr. 2009 1 AD (SC) 587; Sudershan Lohia Vs. Union of
India 2010 IV AD (Delhi) 458; M.N. Damani Vs. S.K. Shukla AIR 2001
SC 2037; Iridium India Telecom Ltd. Vs. Motorola Incorporated & ors.
2010 IX AD (SC) 265 & Rajesh Talwar Vs. CBI 2012 1 AD (SC) 273.
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 352 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Paras Nath Singh on 5 May, 2009
7. The mandatory character of protection afforded to a public servant
by virtue of Section 197 of Cr.P.C., as noticed by a three Judge Bench of
the Apex Court in State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Paras Nath Singh 2009 (6)
SCC 372 , is as under :-
Anil Kumar & Ors vs M.K Aiyappa & Anr on 1 October, 2013
8. Afore-noted dictum has been reiterated by Apex Court in Crl.
Appeal No. 1590-1591 of 2013, Anil Kumar & Ors. Vs. M.K. Aiyappa &
Anr., rendered on 1st October, 2013, which needs to be highlighted. It
reads as under:-
General Officer Commanding vs Cbi & Anr on 1 May, 2012
"Further, this Court in Criminal Appeal No. 257 of 2011
in the case of General Officer, Commanding v. CBI and Anr..
opined as follows: