Rajesh Bajaj vs State Nct Of Delhi And Others on 12 March, 1999
In another decision reported in Rajesh Bajaj v. State of NCT of Delhi, AIR 1999 SC 1216=II (1999) CCR 4 (SC)=II (1999) SLT 523, also the Apex Court held as follows :
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.18 seconds)State Of Kerala & Ors vs O.C.Kuttan & Ors on 17 February, 1999
7. The respondents made out a prima facie case as seen in Annexure-A. It is also submitted that the police, after investigation, submitted a charge-sheet before the Trial Court. Therefore, in the light of the above decision of the Apex Court, I do not find any reason to quash F.I.R. and also the subsequent proceedings as the power to quash FIR can be exercised only in rarest of rare cases. It is submitted that the first petitioner is very old and is partially blind. Learned Counsel for the first respondent denied the said statement.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 498A in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 382 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 468 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Usha Ahuja vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 24 August, 1999
6. Mr. P.C. Joseph has filed a counter-affidavit for and on behalf of the first respondent, wherein he has stated that after investigation the police laid the charge-sheet before the J.F.C.M. In the decision reported in Usha Ahuja v. State of Haryana, AIR 1999 SC 3242=III (1999) CCR 227 (SC)=VII (1999) SLT 382, the Apex Court held as follows :
1