Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.96 seconds)

Union Of India vs Satish Chandra Sharma on 30 November, 1979

That not satisfied with the reply of the PIO, the appellant filed First Appeal before FAA, Vigilance Department. The FAA, after going through the facts vide his order dated 03.05.2023, observed in respect of Point No. 1 & 2, that in cases where the investigation/inquiry process is under process and where disclosure of information would impede the process of investigation, the same are exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act, 2005. Further as regards Point No. 3, it was observed that the information sought falls under the category of personal/information as per judgement of Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 13.11.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 10045/2010 and Civil Appeal No. 2683/2010 titled CPIO/Supreme Court of India Vs Satish Chander Aggarwal. They are covered under 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, 2005. As such, the reply provided by the PIO is in order.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 11 - V R Iyer - Full Document
1