Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.49 seconds)Section 107 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Prof. Yashpal & Anr vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors on 11 February, 2005
6. Reliance has also been placed in the judgment in the case of Praveen
-4-
Kumar Lunia and one another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Cr.R.
No.922 of 2019 decided on 04.10.2019, by the co-ordinate Bench of
this Court and in Tikam Chand Rathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
reported in 2019 LawSuit (Chh) 809, and the decision of this Court and
Vijayalakshmi Vs. The State of rep. By the Inspector of Police &
Anr. reported in 2013 SCC OnLine Mad 42 and on the State of M.P.
Vs. S.B. Johari & Ors. reported in (2000) 2 SCC 57. It is submitted that
this is also is similar case. Hence, it is prayed that the applicants may be
discharged.
Tikam Chand Rathi vs State Of Chhattisgarh 37 Wpc/1843/2019 ... on 17 June, 2019
6. Reliance has also been placed in the judgment in the case of Praveen
-4-
Kumar Lunia and one another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Cr.R.
No.922 of 2019 decided on 04.10.2019, by the co-ordinate Bench of
this Court and in Tikam Chand Rathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
reported in 2019 LawSuit (Chh) 809, and the decision of this Court and
Vijayalakshmi Vs. The State of rep. By the Inspector of Police &
Anr. reported in 2013 SCC OnLine Mad 42 and on the State of M.P.
Vs. S.B. Johari & Ors. reported in (2000) 2 SCC 57. It is submitted that
this is also is similar case. Hence, it is prayed that the applicants may be
discharged.
State Of M.P vs S.B. Johari & Others on 17 January, 2000
6. Reliance has also been placed in the judgment in the case of Praveen
-4-
Kumar Lunia and one another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh in Cr.R.
No.922 of 2019 decided on 04.10.2019, by the co-ordinate Bench of
this Court and in Tikam Chand Rathi Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
reported in 2019 LawSuit (Chh) 809, and the decision of this Court and
Vijayalakshmi Vs. The State of rep. By the Inspector of Police &
Anr. reported in 2013 SCC OnLine Mad 42 and on the State of M.P.
Vs. S.B. Johari & Ors. reported in (2000) 2 SCC 57. It is submitted that
this is also is similar case. Hence, it is prayed that the applicants may be
discharged.
Praveen Pradhan vs State Of Uttranchal & Anr on 4 October, 2012
In reply, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicants that the
case is not similar to the case in the Praveen Pradhan (Supra) and
Chitresh Kumar Chopra (Supra), the applicants have the authority to
keep the students under discipline and they were simply exercising that
authority without any intention of causing harm to the deceased. The
deceased being over-sensitive has taken it otherwise. She has taken
seriously the harsh words spoken to her. Strict action taken against the
deceased were for the purpose of her betterment and there had been no
other intention on the part of the applicants. Therefore, it cannot be said
that the applicants had created any circumstance from which the
deceased could not come out. It is a different case and the applicants
are not at all responsible for the suicidal death of the deceased.
Gangula Mohan Reddy vs State Of A.P on 5 January, 2010
In the case of Gangula Mohan
Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh reported in (2010) 1 SCC 750, it
has been held that abetment involves a process of instigating a person
or intentionally aiding a person in doing of a thing without a positive act
on the part of the accused to instigate or aid in committing suicide. To
convict for offence under Section 306 of I.P.C., there has to be a clear
mens-rea to commit the offence.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Smt. Jayashree Wd/O. Sunil Kotgirwar vs State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 20 March, 2017
4. Reliance has been placed on the judgment of Bombay High Court in the
case of Smt. Jayashree wd/o Sunil Kotgirwar Vs. State of
Maharashtra & Anr. reported in 2017 SCC OnLine Bom 342. In that
case, the deceased was a student against whom there was a complaint
that she had stolen a mobile phone and the same was told to her by her
teacher, subsequent to which, she hanged herself. The High Court held
that this act of the teacher was not an abetment.