Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.54 seconds)Section 100 in The Representation of the People Act, 1951 [Entire Act]
The Representation Of The People Act, 1950
The Representation of the People Act, 1951
Article 329 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
S.T. Muthusami vs K. Natarajan & Ors on 20 January, 1988
His grievance as to such non- allotment of the symbol
will have to be agitated in an election petition (if need be) as held
in S.T.Muthuswami (supra).
Article 324 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
N.P. Ponnuswami vs Returning Officer, Namakkal ... on 21 January, 1952
Learned counsel for the writ petitioner before the High
Court had relied upon a judgment of this Court in S.T.
Muthusami v. K. Natarajan & Ors. (1988 1 SCC 572) wherein
this Court had held following the judgment in Ponnuswami's case
(supra) that entertaining of a writ petition by the High Court
under Article 226 of the Constitution cannot be supported and
consequently it set aside the judgment of the Division Bench of
the High Court and dismissed the writ petition filed in the High
Court. In that case the question involved was a dispute between
two candidates claiming the official symbol of a political party.
This judgment came to be distinguished by the High Court on the
basis of facts though the law laid down there was squarely
applicable against the maintainability of the writ petition.