Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.42 seconds)
Naveen Temani S/O Brijkishore Temani vs State Of Rajasthan on 1 April, 2026 cites

Manoj Sharma vs State & Ors on 16 October, 2008

15. At this stage, it is also pertinent to note that the investigation is at a crucial stage, with arrest of 18 persons, including the applicant's father and other co-accused. The requirement of custodial interrogation, recovery of electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptops, and SIM cards, and unearthing the larger conspiracy cannot be ruled out. Grant of anticipatory bail in such circumstances would seriously impede the course of investigation. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant regarding the alleged compromise entered into with the complainant does not impress this Court. Firstly, the said compromise is not even signed by the applicant himself but by his father. Secondly, the offence alleged is not merely of a private or civil nature but has far-reaching ramifications on society at large, (Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:36:17 PM) (Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 09:14:46 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:12775] (8 of 10) [CRLMB-3107/2026] particularly affecting unsuspecting and vulnerable individuals. It is well settled principle, as also held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in a catena of judgments, inter alia, Manoj Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2008(16) SCC 1; Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab : 20132 (10) SCC 303; Nariender Singh Vs. State of Punjab : 2014 (6) SCC 466; Dimpey Gujral Vs. UT, Chandigarh : 2013 (11) SCC 497 and State of TN Vs. R.Vasantri Stanley : 2016 (1) SCC 376, that in cases involving serious economic offences and organized cyber frauds, the element of societal impact assumes significance, and such matters cannot be lightly compounded on the basis of a purported settlement. This Court is also not oblivious of the submission advanced on behalf of the complainant regarding her precarious financial condition and the denial of interim relief in respect of the recovered amount. The plea of the applicant that he is a bona fide person residing abroad and that the transactions pertain to cryptocurrency dealings, at this stage, does not inspire confidence so as to dislodge the prima facie case emerging from the investigation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 37 - Cited by 2753 - A Kabir - Full Document

Gian Singh vs State Of Punjab & Anr on 24 September, 2012

15. At this stage, it is also pertinent to note that the investigation is at a crucial stage, with arrest of 18 persons, including the applicant's father and other co-accused. The requirement of custodial interrogation, recovery of electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptops, and SIM cards, and unearthing the larger conspiracy cannot be ruled out. Grant of anticipatory bail in such circumstances would seriously impede the course of investigation. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant regarding the alleged compromise entered into with the complainant does not impress this Court. Firstly, the said compromise is not even signed by the applicant himself but by his father. Secondly, the offence alleged is not merely of a private or civil nature but has far-reaching ramifications on society at large, (Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:36:17 PM) (Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 09:14:46 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:12775] (8 of 10) [CRLMB-3107/2026] particularly affecting unsuspecting and vulnerable individuals. It is well settled principle, as also held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in a catena of judgments, inter alia, Manoj Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2008(16) SCC 1; Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab : 20132 (10) SCC 303; Nariender Singh Vs. State of Punjab : 2014 (6) SCC 466; Dimpey Gujral Vs. UT, Chandigarh : 2013 (11) SCC 497 and State of TN Vs. R.Vasantri Stanley : 2016 (1) SCC 376, that in cases involving serious economic offences and organized cyber frauds, the element of societal impact assumes significance, and such matters cannot be lightly compounded on the basis of a purported settlement. This Court is also not oblivious of the submission advanced on behalf of the complainant regarding her precarious financial condition and the denial of interim relief in respect of the recovered amount. The plea of the applicant that he is a bona fide person residing abroad and that the transactions pertain to cryptocurrency dealings, at this stage, does not inspire confidence so as to dislodge the prima facie case emerging from the investigation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 81 - Cited by 53834 - R M Lodha - Full Document

Dimpey Gujral & Ors vs U.T.Chandigarh & Ors on 6 December, 2012

15. At this stage, it is also pertinent to note that the investigation is at a crucial stage, with arrest of 18 persons, including the applicant's father and other co-accused. The requirement of custodial interrogation, recovery of electronic devices such as mobile phones, laptops, and SIM cards, and unearthing the larger conspiracy cannot be ruled out. Grant of anticipatory bail in such circumstances would seriously impede the course of investigation. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant regarding the alleged compromise entered into with the complainant does not impress this Court. Firstly, the said compromise is not even signed by the applicant himself but by his father. Secondly, the offence alleged is not merely of a private or civil nature but has far-reaching ramifications on society at large, (Uploaded on 01/04/2026 at 05:36:17 PM) (Downloaded on 01/04/2026 at 09:14:46 PM) [2026:RJ-JP:12775] (8 of 10) [CRLMB-3107/2026] particularly affecting unsuspecting and vulnerable individuals. It is well settled principle, as also held by Hon'ble Supreme Court in a catena of judgments, inter alia, Manoj Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : 2008(16) SCC 1; Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab : 20132 (10) SCC 303; Nariender Singh Vs. State of Punjab : 2014 (6) SCC 466; Dimpey Gujral Vs. UT, Chandigarh : 2013 (11) SCC 497 and State of TN Vs. R.Vasantri Stanley : 2016 (1) SCC 376, that in cases involving serious economic offences and organized cyber frauds, the element of societal impact assumes significance, and such matters cannot be lightly compounded on the basis of a purported settlement. This Court is also not oblivious of the submission advanced on behalf of the complainant regarding her precarious financial condition and the denial of interim relief in respect of the recovered amount. The plea of the applicant that he is a bona fide person residing abroad and that the transactions pertain to cryptocurrency dealings, at this stage, does not inspire confidence so as to dislodge the prima facie case emerging from the investigation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 13 - Cited by 291 - Full Document
1