Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.51 seconds)
Rajumon T.M vs Union Of India on 7 May, 2025 cites

U.O.I. And Ors vs Keshar Singh on 1 July, 2015

34. Thus, in the facts and circumstances discussed above, we are of the view that while there cannot be any dispute about the correctness of the legal principles enunciated by this Court in the above-mentioned cases of Keshar Singh (supra), Surinder Singh Rathore (supra), A.V.Damodaran (supra); Jujhar Singh (supra) and Talwinder Singh (supra), we would hasten to add that the opinion of the Medical Board which is to be treated as final and binding as per aforesaid Regulations, has to be supported by reasons for arriving at the conclusion about the nature of medical disability, before the same can be acted upon for the purpose of discharge of a serviceman and denial of disability pension as otherwise, a valuable right of a serviceman to get retiral benefits who has rendered long years of service for the nation would be unjustly deprived.
Supreme Court of India Cites 28 - Cited by 7 - R Gogoi - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Surinder Singh Rathore on 13 March, 2008

34. Thus, in the facts and circumstances discussed above, we are of the view that while there cannot be any dispute about the correctness of the legal principles enunciated by this Court in the above-mentioned cases of Keshar Singh (supra), Surinder Singh Rathore (supra), A.V.Damodaran (supra); Jujhar Singh (supra) and Talwinder Singh (supra), we would hasten to add that the opinion of the Medical Board which is to be treated as final and binding as per aforesaid Regulations, has to be supported by reasons for arriving at the conclusion about the nature of medical disability, before the same can be acted upon for the purpose of discharge of a serviceman and denial of disability pension as otherwise, a valuable right of a serviceman to get retiral benefits who has rendered long years of service for the nation would be unjustly deprived.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 22 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Secr.,Ministry Of Defence & Ors vs Damodaran A.V.(D) Thr.Lrs. & Ors on 20 August, 2009

35. It may also be noted that in A.V. Damodaran (supra) where this Court had dealt with the discharge due to Schizophrenia, the Medical Board had given detailed reasons for their opinion as mentioned in Para 4 of the aforesaid decision, which is not the case in other cited cases and also in the present case. Page 29 of 31 The issue of giving reasons for the opinion of the Medical Board has not been discussed in these cited cases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 35 - D Bhandari - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Jujhar Singh on 15 July, 2011

34. Thus, in the facts and circumstances discussed above, we are of the view that while there cannot be any dispute about the correctness of the legal principles enunciated by this Court in the above-mentioned cases of Keshar Singh (supra), Surinder Singh Rathore (supra), A.V.Damodaran (supra); Jujhar Singh (supra) and Talwinder Singh (supra), we would hasten to add that the opinion of the Medical Board which is to be treated as final and binding as per aforesaid Regulations, has to be supported by reasons for arriving at the conclusion about the nature of medical disability, before the same can be acted upon for the purpose of discharge of a serviceman and denial of disability pension as otherwise, a valuable right of a serviceman to get retiral benefits who has rendered long years of service for the nation would be unjustly deprived.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 13 - P Sathasivam - Full Document

Union Of India & Anr vs Talwinder Singh on 20 April, 2012

34. Thus, in the facts and circumstances discussed above, we are of the view that while there cannot be any dispute about the correctness of the legal principles enunciated by this Court in the above-mentioned cases of Keshar Singh (supra), Surinder Singh Rathore (supra), A.V.Damodaran (supra); Jujhar Singh (supra) and Talwinder Singh (supra), we would hasten to add that the opinion of the Medical Board which is to be treated as final and binding as per aforesaid Regulations, has to be supported by reasons for arriving at the conclusion about the nature of medical disability, before the same can be acted upon for the purpose of discharge of a serviceman and denial of disability pension as otherwise, a valuable right of a serviceman to get retiral benefits who has rendered long years of service for the nation would be unjustly deprived.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 40 - Full Document

Veer Pal Singh vs Secretary,Ministry Of Defence on 2 July, 2013

29. We are mindful of the fact that we are dealing with the case of disability due to Schizophrenia which impairs the cognitive capacity of the person, which naturally will affect the ability of the appellant to properly advance his own cause relating to the cause and circumstance of the illness before the authority. This Court has been cognizant of the debilitating effects of Schizophrenia in Veer Pal Singh v. Ministry of Defence, (2013) 8 SCC 83 in the following words:
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 24 - G S Singhvi - Full Document
1