Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Bajaj Alliainz General Insurance ... vs Shri. Sagar Haribhau Dumbre And Anr on 4 March, 2025 cites

National Insurance Co. Ltd vs Pranay Sethi on 31 October, 2017

In view of a decision in National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and others.1, some amount shall be added to the actual loss of the income of the Respondent No.1. As per the oral and documentary evidence on record, Respondent No.1 was aged 39 years at the time of accident. However, his income was not regular. Hence, the addition towards his future prospects should be 40% of the loss of the future income of Rs.10,08,000/- as held above. On such addition, the actual loss of the future income of Respondent No.1 comes to Rs.14,11,200/- (1008000 + 403200).
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 9815 - D Misra - Full Document

Mohd. Sabeer @ Shabir Hussain vs Regional Manager, U.P. State Road ... on 9 December, 2022

17) The Tribunal has not awarded an 'attendant charges'. It is common experience that in such cases of amputation, without an attendant, an injured person cannot even have his daily simple morning routine until sufficient recovery from the injury. The Respondent No.1 was earning lesser income. Therefore, it is probable that the he was attended by someone in the family, skipping on her/his earnings. I, therefore, deem it appropriate to award Rs.25,000/- under this head. Considering the facts of the case in hand and, the decision in Mohd. Sabeer (supra), Respondent No.1 is entitled to get Rs.1,00,000/- towards the loss due to the disability and disfigurement. Sufficient compensation is awarded for 'discomfort', 'pain and suffering' and 'loss of enjoyment of life'.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 32 - K Murari - Full Document

Jupiter Apartments No.Ii Co-Op. ... vs M/S. National Enterprises And Ors on 23 February, 2015

ii) G. Vivek vs. National insurance Co. Ltd. and another 3. In this case the injured aged 12 years suffered amputation of right leg. The permanent disability was 97 % with reference to the his right leg. In this background and considering the evidence on record, the Hon'ble Supreme Court awarded Rs.26,00,000/- towards cost and maintenance of prothesis.
Bombay High Court Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - A V Mohta - Full Document
1