Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.32 seconds)Section 106 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Section 27 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 [Entire Act]
Vinod Khanna And Ors. vs Bakshi Sachdev on 20 April, 1995
49.This is also the fair rate of mesne profits, having regard to the
commercial usage of the property, its location and extent.
Although the plaintiff has not produced any witness other than
himself to support his claim, this can be inferred by taking
judicial notice of the phenomenal rise in rents in Delhi. That the
Court is competent to take judicial notice of the rise in rental
values follows from the decision of Vinod Khanna v. Bakshi
Sachdev AIR 1996 Delhi 32, wherein the Hon'ble High Court of
Delhi noted:
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Kanta Goel vs B.P. Pathak & Ors on 1 April, 1977
In the case of Kanta Goel vs. B.P. Pathak & Ors., AIR 1977 SC
1599 the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as under :
Dhannalal vs Kalawatibai & Ors on 8 July, 2000
Similarly, in the case of Dhannalal vs. Kalawatibai and Others,
AIR 2002 SC 2572(1) the Hon'ble Supreme Court noted as
under :
D.C. Oswal vs V.K.Subbiah And Ors on 12 November, 1991
Even the Apex Court has taken judicial notice of the
fact of universal escalation of rent and even raised rent of
disputed premises by taking such judicial notice in case of D.C.
Oswal v. V.K. Subbiah AIR 1992 SC 184".